Articles

Use of Juries Under Scrutiny Again

Posted onFebruary 20, 2014

Recent research brings trial by jury back into the spotlight and suggests that juries need more support from the courts in understanding their role in the trial process.

Findings by the jury project at University College London, headed by Professor Cheryl Thomas showed that almost a quarter of jurors did not understand the restrictions on their use of the internet during a trial on which they are sitting. The team spoke to 239 jurors immediately after they had returned verdicts in trials in London over the past year.

Jurors are warned in every case by the trial judge that they must only return a verdict based on the evidence presented in court, and that they must not try to research the alleged crime or the defendant using any resources, including the internet or social media. Despite this, Thomas’ research found that in respect of the restrictions:

16% wrongly believed that they are not allowed to check their emails during their service period.
5% believed that there were no restrictions at all on their internet use during the trial.
2% believed that they were allowed to look up matters online provided that they did not let it affect their judgement of the case.

The research comes after a spate of high profile cases in which jurors, in a twist of fortune, have found themselves in the dock after jeopardising criminal proceedings with their behaviour during trial. In January this year Theodora Dallas was sentenced to six months imprisonment after conducting her own research of a defendant during trial and telling her fellow jurors of what she had found out about the defendant. The case followed from Joanne Fraill from Manchester who was sentenced to eight months imprisonment after sending a defendant messages via Facebook, as well as conducting her own research. Worryingly, whilst most jurors would be content to report jury tampering from an external source, the research suggests that they would be less keen to report a problem stemming from within their own jury panel, including where a fellow juror had researched the case independently.

Rob Rode and his team have a well deserved national reputation. They are extremely experienced and regularly deal with high profile matters.’
Legal 500, 2023
Excellent partners and staff. Particular expertise in heavy complex crime and mental health. Always available, unfailingly courteous with clients, yet with a steely resolve to achieve results.
Legal 500, 2023
Anna Moran is the best representative I've ever seen in my life, she represented me as if she was there the day everything happened
Client, anonymous for confidentiality
Rob Rode and Andy Stewardson are first rate in the field of fraud and POCA work.
Legal 500, 2023
Many thanks to Julie and Tony. You were understanding and gave great advice from the beginning. The outcome was fantastic and we are now relieved of all stress. We will recommend you highly.
Client, anonymous for confidentiality
Rob Rode and James McAulay are acknowledged market leaders. They are exceptional lawyers and motivators and the teams they lead are dedicated.
Legal 500, 2023
I would not hesitate to use ABR Solicitors again and cannot thank them enough for their service. ABR did a fantastic job.
Client, anonymous for confidentiality
They are really very good at handling major complex defence cases and in particular serious fraud. A first rate firm with strong team delivering one of the best overall services in the area.’
Legal 500, 2023
ABR and James were exemplary. He calmed me down and explained the process and possible outcome. He worked very hard for the best outcome and I would have no hesitation recommending the firm to another.
Client, anonymous for confidentiality
ABR Solicitors have a track record of doing complex fraud cases. They will do private cases, legal aid cases or insurance backed work. They offer the same levels of service in each case. They prepare their cases very thoroughly and the feedback from clients is exceptional.
Legal 500, 2020
ABR are a large firm and have a specialist fraud team. The team are genuine specialists, experienced and extremely knowledgeable. The ABR fraud team have been involved in large and high profile cases and regularly deal with paper-heavy, complex cases. Many firms claim specialism in the fraud arena, however there are relatively few who can deliver on that claim. ABR are genuine specialists who can.
Legal 500, 2020
The crime team as a whole is hardworking, knowledgeable and very committed to their clients. they always go the extra mile in terms of preparation and nothing is too much trouble. they have a reputation for always valuing client carer highly and ensuring the client gets the best representation at all times.
Legal 500, 2020
Fiercely loyal to the client and they fight the client’s corner with great gusto. If you want to fight your case then get to ABR. They never ever give up.
Legal 500, 2020